tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10236097.post8541582255675927345..comments2024-01-08T07:24:11.477-05:00Comments on Poker and Miscellaneous Stuff: Ober....Unger....Unger....Dunn.....Dunn....OberPokahDavehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10027330069984105732noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10236097.post-58533664972299957512009-05-03T18:28:00.000-04:002009-05-03T18:28:00.000-04:00Just an observation from playing on both FT and St...Just an observation from playing on both FT and Stars. And I've played both, tournaments and cash games, a LOT! <br />I don't know the percentage but the larger of the two stacks consistently winds up winning the hand, even if they are dominated pre-flop. <br />Wouldn't be surprised if it's a software glitch where the software is trying to eliminate the weaker of the two players to move the game along. <br />There are definitely patterns on both FT and Stars. <br />A bad beat is one thing but the consistency of them going against the larger of the two stacks is another.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10236097.post-34987481196300730632009-05-03T17:05:00.000-04:002009-05-03T17:05:00.000-04:00That's where LAG players have a big advantage over...That's where LAG players have a big advantage over us. They get chips early and can afford to lose a race or lose an 80/20 and still have chips. I have tried to play that way but haven't had much success. I have the same problem as you, we get deep but end up short stacked and our only move is all in. Then the donk big stack calls our all in w/56 and cracks our big pair. All you can do is keep getting the chips in with good hands. gl in the millionJeremyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01603892817506962135noreply@blogger.com